Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/313935 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
IEA Discussion Paper No. 34
Publisher: 
Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), London
Abstract: 
A look at how cutting non-means-tested benefits and reforming state pensions could save £16bn a yearIn Sharing the burden - How the older generation should suffer its share of the cuts the IEA looks at the savings that would be made if non-means-tested benefits to older people were cut and the state pension system were reformed.Older people enjoy a privileged position at present. The non-means-tested benefits they receive have not been removed or reduced and the basic state pension is planned to increase above inflation. They also receive particularly favourable treatment in the tax system, with higher personal allowances than younger people and even a marriage allowance if one partner is over 75.This group has received special treatment by the government in its spending review - it has been left more or less exempt from spending cuts. At the same time younger people have felt the cuts through changes such as in tuition fees and child benefit. This paper shows how the government could save £16bn a year by cutting non-means-tested benefits to older people and reforming the state pension system.
Subjects: 
Public spending
Public debt
Budget consolidation
Older people
Great Britain
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.