Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/311667 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2024-41
Verlag: 
Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper examines and proposes strategies to strengthen the development and regulation of Higher Education in the Philippines as enacted by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED). Through a comprehensive review of CHED's mandate, a comparative analysis of higher education systems throughout Southeast Asia, and interviews with representatives from CHED and various Higher Education institutions, the study identifies strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement. Key issues faced include a disproportionate focus on regulation over development, challenges faced by universities in faculty capacity building, gaps in research and innovation support, and the misalignment of higher education curricula with board requirements and labor market demands. Drawing lessons from best practices throughout the region, the study recommends adopting a hybrid approach to foster equitable growth and innovation. Specific strategies include improving CHED's organizational efficiency by delineating regulatory and developmental functions, enhancing faculty development programs, and fostering partnerships between HEIs and industry to bridge the skills gap. The study also calls for improving university categorization, harmonizing accreditation standards among various accrediting bodies, strengthening internal quality assurance systems, and increasing financial support for underperforming but potential HEIs. By addressing these critical areas, CHED may better be able to fulfill its developmental and regulatory mandates.
Schlagwörter: 
higher education
CHED
regulatory capacity
developmental capacity
quality assurance
accreditation
faculty development
Southeast Asia
policy reform
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.21 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.