Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/309407 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] Finance and Society [ISSN:] 2059-5999 [Volume:] 8 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 42-66
Publisher: 
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Abstract: 
Recently parallels have been drawn between Bitcoin and Yapese stone money. This article focuses on Fitzpatrick and McKeon's (2019) exploration of similarities and differences. The analogy between Bitcoin and Yapese stone money is based on proposed commonalities that are inaccurate, ill-defined, and/or trivial. However, this does not signal a need to refine the comparison, but rather a need to reconsider the rationale for attempting it in the first place. Recent attempts to redefine Yapese stone money using terminology from the field of cryptocurrency reproduces a longer textual history in which writers from the Global North have misrepresented Yap for pedagogic or polemic convenience. Examples include works by William Furness III, John Maynard Keynes, Milton Friedman, and influential macroeconomics textbooks, such as N. Gregory Mankiw's Macroeconomics. This history features frequent colonialist tropes of Yap as well as the erasure of histories of colonial violence and power. More caution should be exercised in the study and pedagogic use of Yapese economic cultures, and greater effort should be made to center Yapese voices, acknowledge colonial contexts, and reflect positionality and uncertainty.
Subjects: 
Bitcoin
blockchain
macroeconomics
money
social currency
Yap
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
369.42 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.