Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/309355 
Year of Publication: 
2018
Citation: 
[Journal:] Finance and Society [ISSN:] 2059-5999 [Volume:] 4 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2018 [Pages:] 41-59
Publisher: 
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Abstract: 
This article examines the conceptual transformation of what was once considered usury into finance. To counter traditional arguments that usury was exploitative and unnatural, early modern theorists reconceptualized debt as a form of investment for both borrowers and lenders. Today, this ethical justification of debt as an investment underlies the rhetoric of finance and financialization. Close examination of the realities of contemporary financialized debt, however, reveal that much of this rhetoric is misleading and false. While the rhetoric of finance is unrelentingly oriented toward the future, the lived reality of debt is one of being constrained and haunted by the past. Relatedly, this rhetoric exhorts borrowing for investment, while finance has actually had the opposite effect of making consumer debt a necessity for the majority of Americans. Taken together, these realities of debt today contradict the rhetoric of finance as investment and undermine the ethical framework on which it depends.
Subjects: 
Ethics
usury
debt
finance
rhetoric
investment
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
883.92 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.