Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/305126 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Citation: 
[Journal:] German Journal of Agricultural Economics (GJAE) [ISSN:] 2191-4028 [Volume:] 70 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 182-191
Publisher: 
Deutscher Fachverlag, Frankfurt a. M.
Abstract: 
The paper investigates the influence of different model specifications for interpreting the results of discrete choice experiments when investigating heterogeneous public landscape preferences. Comparing model specifications based on the Mixed Multinomial Logit and the Generalized Multinomial Logit Model reveals that the parameter estimates appear qualitatively comparable. Still, a more in-depth investigation of the conditional estimate distributions of the sample show that parameter interactions in the Generalized Multinomial Logit Model lead to different interpretations compared to the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model. This highlights the potential impact of common model specifications in the results in landscape preference studies.
Subjects: 
discrete choice experiment
public landscape prefer-ences
livestock
Mixed Multinomial Logit Model
Generalized Multinomial Mixed Logit Model
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.