Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/303907 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
I4R Discussion Paper Series No. 169
Publisher: 
Institute for Replication (I4R), s.l.
Abstract: 
In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Wang et al. (2023) estimate the association of social isolation or loneliness with mortality outcomes. In their preferred analytical specification, the authors find an increased risk of mortality from all causes for both exposures: a pooled effect size for social isolation of 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 1.39; P ﹤ 0.001; a pooled effect size for loneliness of 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.20; P ﹤ 0.001. We computationally reproduce these results by extracting data from the article PDF and re-implementing the original analysis, and we compare the extracted data with data that we later received from the authors. Second, we assess the robustness of the main results against plausible alternative analytic choices in three areas: estimation of the random effects models, heterogeneity, and adjustment for publication bias. We find that the main claims of the original authors are robust, although the majority of methods to adjust for publication bias suggest somewhat smaller effects than the original estimates.
Subjects: 
meta-analysis
computational reproducibility
robustness reproduction
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.