Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/303326 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2011
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
LEQS Paper No. 43
Verlag: 
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), European Institute, London
Zusammenfassung: 
Explanations of the dynamics of EU judicial politics must also account for its incidence, namely when and in which sectors litigation of EU law and ECJ judgments occur. This incidence, it is suggested relies on a relationship between three arenas, those for norm-setting, litigation and judgments, as events in each of these arena conditions possibilities for action in the others. This paper analyses the relationship between these arenas through a study of all 2007-9 preliminary rulings and finds EU judicial politics characterised by two predominant dynamics. 'Patrol norms' dedicated to securing common policies give rise to low salient judgments dominated by transnational enterprise and national administration litigation. 'Thickly evaluative norms' are concerned with articulating certain values. Dominated by litigation by domestic undertakings and non-commercial actors, these norms generate the Court's salient judgments.
Schlagwörter: 
Court of Justice
judicial politics
preliminary rulings
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
846.41 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.