Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/303305 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
LEQS Paper No. 22
Publisher: 
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), European Institute, London
Abstract: 
The latest global financial crisis has allowed the International Monetary Fund (IMF) a spectacular comeback. But despite its notorious reputation as a staunch advocate of restrictive economic policies, the Fund has displayed less preference for austerity in recent crisis lending. Though widely welcomed as overdue, the IMF's shift away from what John Williamson coined the 'Washington Consensus' was met with resistance from the European Union (EU) where it concerned Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. The situation of hard-hit Hungary, Latvia, and Romania propelled unprecedented cooperation between the IMF and the EU, in which the EU has very actively promoted orthodox measures in return for loans. We argue that this represents a European rescue of the Washington Consensus. The case of Latvia is paradigmatic for the profound disagreements between an austerity-demanding EU and a less austere IMF. The IMF's stance contradicts conventional wisdom about the organization as the guardian of economic orthodoxy. To solve this puzzle, we shed light on three complementary factors of (non)learning that have shaped the EU's relations vis-à-vis CEE borrowing countries in comparison to the IMF's: (1) a disadvantageous institutional setting; (2) vociferous creditor coalitions; (3) the precarious eurozone project.
Subjects: 
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
European Union (EU)
Washington Consensus
lending
learning
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)
Latvia
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
868.77 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.