Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/30169
Authors: 
Bannier, Christina E.
Feess, Eberhard
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Working paper series // Frankfurt School of Finance & Management 135
Abstract: 
Empirical and experimental papers find that high-powered incentives may reduce performance rather than improve it; a phenomenon referred to as choking under pressure. We show that competition for high ability workers nevertheless leads firms to offer high bonus payments, thereby deliberately accepting pressure-induced performance reductions. Bonus payments allow for a separating equilibrium in which only high ability workers choose high-powered incentive contracts. Low ability workers receive fixed payments and produce their maximum output which, however, is still below the reduced output of high ability workers. Bonus payments lead to a social loss which is increasing in the degree of competition. Our paper helps to explain why steep incentive schemes are persistent in highly-competitive industries such as investment banking, and why the observed performance sensitivity of CEO compensation is largely heterogeneous.
Subjects: 
Performance-related pay
screening
choking under pressure
competition
JEL: 
D86
J31
J33
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
208.08 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.