Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/272300 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
ifo Working Paper No. 393
Publisher: 
ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Munich
Abstract: 
Fiscal rules are a frequent policy measure to restrict deficit-taking among incumbent politicians. In times of increased and sustained investment needs to mitigate the consequences of climate change, and to promote the digital and structural transformation, fiscal rules have become subject to criticism for undermining public investments. We review 20 existing empirical studies examining the impact of numerical fiscal rules on public investments. We also discuss whether more public investments typically come at the cost of higher deficits and whether the effect on public investments differs between rigid and more flexible fiscal rules. Overall, we do not find systematic evidence for a negative effect of fiscal rules on overall public investments. Rigid fiscal rules seem to deter public investments as compared to more flexible and investment-friendly rules which, by contrast, rather increase public investments. Existing evidence does not suggest that public investments systematically come at the cost of higher public deficits (except for more flexible fiscal rules). The design of fiscal rules appears to be crucial for higher public investments.
Subjects: 
Fiscal rules
public investment
fiscal sustainability
golden rule
literature review
JEL: 
H50
H54
H6
H63
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.