Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240166 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Citation: 
[Journal:] Administrative Sciences [ISSN:] 2076-3387 [Volume:] 11 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] MDPI [Place:] Basel [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 1-17
Publisher: 
MDPI, Basel
Abstract: 
This paper analyses the EU's policies for energy and climate, using Börzel's theoretical framework on Europeanisation, and examines Member States' Green Deal responses, strategies, and compliance. As expressed in their final NECPs, although Member States' responses vary, most of the critical components were partially addressed, while the others were largely addressed. We observe a considerable variation in Member States' strategies. Member States classified as foot-dragging beforehand are fence-sitting now, while those previously categorised as fence-sitting are now either foot-dragging or pace-setting. The root cause of these classification changes for the Member States within the EU can be traced back to their internal environments in which the involved stakeholders each have a different response pace regarding environment, climate, and energy. We present and analyse our theoretical context, discuss the EU's energy policies and the NECPs, examine Member States' responses and compliance with this new framework, and propose several challenges.
Subjects: 
compliance
energy
environment
European Union
Green Deal
NECP
strategy
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.