Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23508
Authors: 
Goethals, George R.
Year of Publication: 
2001
Series/Report no.: 
WPEHE discussion paper series / Williams College, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education 61
Abstract: 
A study was conducted to examine peer effects among undergraduates at Williams College, a highly selective four-year liberal arts school. Specifically, the study explored whether students would perform better writing about newspaper articles they read and discussed in academically homogeneous or heterogeneous groups of three. In homogeneous groups all three students were from either the top half or bottom half of their class on academic ratings assigned at the time of admission. Heterogeneous groups included students from both the top and bottom half of their class. The results showed that students in the top and bottom half performed similarly overall, but that students performed better in homogeneous groups, whether those homogeneous groups were made up of students in the top half or the bottom half of their classes. This pattern of results was stronger for men subjects than women subjects. The results were interpreted in terms of the principles of social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954).
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
42.53 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.