Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/234877 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 23-2021
Publisher: 
Philipps-University Marburg, School of Business and Economics, Marburg
Abstract: 
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing in the corporate real estate industry has notably increased since the mid-2000s. Utilizing PVAR-Granger causality model and a fixed-effects panel data model with a rich dataset comprising 234 ESG-rated REITs across five developed economies from 2003 to 2019, this study investigates both the causal relationship and the sign of the association between corporate social and financial performance for the REIT industry. The results suggest that stock market investors pay attention to individual E/S/G metrics and price each component of ESG investing differently, with environmental (E-investing) and social (S-investing) practices being the significant social performance factors influencing the financial performance of REITs. This study is the first attempt to test the social impact hypothesis of the stakeholder theory of the corporation and the neoclassic trade-off argument to explore corporate social responsibility and the market valuation of REITs. We find strong support for the trade-off hypothesis in our full-sample analysis and argue that REITs' environmental policies and activities involve high financial costs that may drain off capital and other company resources and lead to decreasing market returns. We also find that investors have attached a higher value to REITs' social investing performance in the post-GFC period, from 2011 to 2019. A positive premium for S-investing supports the social impact hypothesis, indicating that companies that reduce or ignore socially responsible actions to lower their implicit costs incur higher explicit costs, giving rise to competitive disadvantage.
Subjects: 
Corporate social performance
ESG investing
REITs
financial performance
panel data
fixed effects regression
PVAR Granger causality test
social impact hypothesis
trade-off hypothesis
JEL: 
G11
G15
G32
M14
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.