Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.description.abstract||This essay offers a critical sketch of the Keynesian-monetarist debate about monetarypolicy that took place in the United States in the second half of the 20th. century.1 Thisdebate has not disappeared altogether. Currently discussed issues, such as inflationtargeting and central-bank transparency, are extensions of the older debate adapted tocurrent circumstances. My discussion is informal and impressionistic and tries toconvey the flavor of the debate rather than to contrast fully articulated models. I start bysketching the situation after World War II when American monetarism developed, thentake up the main issues in this debate, and the relation of the current monetary-policyconsensus to monetarism, and conclude with an evaluation of this debate.2In such a discussion one should be open about where one is coming from. I gotinvolved in the issues of the debate at a very early stage, have a strong Friedmanianmethodological preference for combining theoretical analysis with empirical testing,started out with a more or less Keynesian orientation with respect to theory, and thenshifted a good part of the way into the monetarist camp, but was never a full-bloodedmonetarist, or accepted by monetarists as "one of us".||en_US|
|dc.relation.ispartofseries|||aWorking papers / University of California, Department of Economics |x03,9||en_US|
|dc.title||The monetarist policy debate : an informal retrospective||en_US|
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.