Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22867
Authors: 
Mahayni, Antje
Schlögl, Erik
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
Bonn econ discussion papers 2003,19
Abstract: 
We analyse contracts which pay out a guaranteed minimum rate of return and a fraction of a positive excess rate, which is specified on the basis of a benchmark portfolio. These contracts are closely related to unit?linked life?insurance/savings plan products and can be considered as alternatives to a direct investment in the underlying benchmark portfolio. The option embedded into the savings plan is in fact a power option, and thus the specification of the ?fair? contract parameters is closely related to well known features of these financial derivatives. The key issue, both in order to rigorously justify valuation by arbitrage arguments and to prevent the guarantees from becoming uncontrollable liabilities to the issuer, is the risk management of the embedded options by a tractable and realistic hedging strategy. The long maturity of life?insurance products makes it necessary to lift the Black/Scholes assumptions and consider an uncertain volatility scenario, thus explicitly taking into account ?model risk?. In this context, we show how to determine the contract parameters conservatively and implement robust risk management strategies. This highlights the necessity of a careful choice of guarantees which are granted to the insurance customer and suggests a new role for a type of ?bonus account? customary in many life?insurance contracts.
Subjects: 
Minimum return guarantee
defined-contribution pension plans
life-insurance
uncertain volatility
conservative pricing
robust hedging
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.