Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/226792 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
TRiSS Working Paper Series No. TRiSS-WPS-02-2020
Publisher: 
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Trinity Research in Social Sciences (TRiSS), Dublin
Abstract: 
The widespreadunderstandingthat the ECJ'searly fundamental rights jurisprudence in Internationale Handelsgesellschaft (1970) and other cases was developed in response to judgments of theGerman and Italian Constitutional Courts has recently been questioned.Delledonne and Fabbriniclaimboth that the conventional account ischronologically inaccurate -the European Court's famous fundamental rights decisions came beforethose of the German and Italian courts -and that it relies on an understanding ofpostwarhuman rights leadershipby these national constitutional courts which a closer look at theiractual record does not support.This paper demonstrates however that there is substantially more evidence that the Court of Justice was responding to the concerns of the German and Italian constitutional courts than is frequently set out by either critics or supporters of the more conventional approach. The Court of Justice's famous fundamental rights decisions did indeed comeafterthis issue had been first highlightedin judgments ofthe German and Italianconstitutionalcourts; thethreat to the uniform application of European law posed by the fundamental rights aspect of thesejudgments wasprominently notedin the writings ofECJ judges;andthe caution shownby the German and Italian constitutional courtsin reviewing postwar domestic legislation on human rights groundsis not in conflict with an active rolein promoting the ECJ's new human rights jurisprudence. In short therefore,there isconsiderableevidence that the ECJ was motivated to create its new human rights jurisprudence by the possible threatto the uniform applicationof European law posed by theGerman and Italianconstitutional courts.
Subjects: 
European Court of Justice
German Constitutional Court
Italian Constitutional Court
Human Rights
European Law
Robert Lecourt
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.