Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/220003
Authors: 
Duan, Jianhua
Xuefeng, Qian
Das, Kuntal K.
Meriluoto, Laura
Reed, W. Robert
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal [ISSN:] 1864-6042 [Year:] 2020 [Volume:] 14 [Issue:] 2020-21 [Pages:] 1-30
Abstract: 
This study replicates Ahn, Khandelwal, and Wei's (2011) model of intermediary trade. The study produces two main results. First, the authors are able to reproduce empirical evidence for AKW's three main predictions for Chinese exports. This is impressive because much of the data for their replication are independently sourced. However, when the authors subject their model to additional tests, they find that the evidence is not robust. Using more recently available data to test AKW's first prediction, the authors estimate coefficients that are wrong-signed and significant. When they re-analyze the evidence supporting the second and third predictions, they find that the full sample results mask significant heterogeneity across Chinese regions. In many cases, key coefficients are insignificant. In a few cases, they are wrong-signed and significant. Finally, using multiple versions of a key variable measuring the number of required import documents by country, the authors discover that the results are not robust across versions.
Subjects: 
intermediaries
exports
productivity
heterogeneous firms
China
JEL: 
F1
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
453.68 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.