Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/216779 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IUBH Discussion Papers - Sozialwissenschaften No. 3/2020
Publisher: 
IUBH Internationale Hochschule, Erfurt
Abstract (Translated): 
A novel Covid-19 virus initially threatens the Chinese metropolis of Wu-Han and has been causing a global pandemic in 2020. In order to impede the spread of the virus and thus relieve the burden on the respective health care systems, governments around the world are being forced to impose unprecedented restrictions on social life. In addition to closing all forms of public life and cancelling all public events, the measures taken in Austria also include an initial restriction for the individual to stay at home. From an economic-psychological point of view, the decision to comply with these measures can be described as a social dilemma. The individual would profit from defection but at the expense of the general public. The Federal Government must therefore provide appropriate incentives to convince citizens to still comply either through trust or sanctions. Using the example of Austria, this article examines how the emergence of the crisis is first perceived, which communication strategies are used to motivate citizens to comply and why citizens sometimes react with supposedly irrational actions.
Subjects: 
Corona-crisis
social dilemma
justice perception
reactance
in-group bias
loss aversion
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.