Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/212499
Authors: 
Kutan, Ali M.
Pautola-Mol, Niina
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
BOFIT Discussion Papers No. 1/2002
Publisher: 
Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition (BOFIT), Helsinki
Abstract: 
This paper evaluates the functioning, suitability, and effectiveness of the Maastricht convergence criteria regarding fiscal policy and the Stability and Growth Pact for the Baltic States.We argue that the Maastricht fiscal targets from the Baltic perspective should be considered as long-term goals as opposed to short-run objectives of fiscal policy.Using the European Commission's approach as well as impulse response and variance decomposition techniques, we assess the fiscal discipline and cyclical sensitivity of each state's budget to changes in output gap.Empirical evidence indicates that Estonia and Latvia have been more successful in maintaining fiscal discipline than Lithuania during 1996-2000.We also observe that the Stability and Growth Pact signed in July 1997 would offer enough room for automatic fiscal stabilizers in Estonia and Latvia, but not necessarily in Lithuania.Policy implications of the findings for future perspectives are also discussed.
Subjects: 
EU-enlargement
fiscal policy
Baltic countries
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
951-686-818-5
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.