Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/211397
Authors: 
Medeiros, Marcelo C.
Barbosa, Rogério J.
Carvalhaes, Flavio
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
Texto para Discussão 2447
Abstract (Translated): 
Using retrospective simulations, we examine whether educational expansions in the past could have reduced earnings inequality and income poverty in Brazil. We use data from three censuses and 35 national household surveys (PNAD). The simulations indicate that there are important limitations to what educational policies can do: it would take many decades to reduce inequality and poverty and only a significant scale-up of university education would lead to much lower levels of inequality and poverty. The growth required to have made that possible would have been impressive. Such a reduction could also only have occurred under optimistic assumptions about growth, job-skill matching, and non-declining returns to education. In short, education is not a panacea to poverty and inequality. These results are robust when tested with different data sources, in different decades, and using various measures of inequality and poverty. Our results provide a standard to gauge the effects of other policies in education-equivalent terms.
Subjects: 
income inequality
poverty
education
economic growth
JEL: 
J31
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.