Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/21051
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-Feld | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Christoph M. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Baltussen, Rob | en |
dc.contributor.author | Sauerborn, Rainer | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-01-28T16:18:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-01-28T16:18:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21051 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The context of community-based interventions presents formidable problems for any evaluationanalysis. Group-randomized studies do possess ideal properties in theory, but in practice, grouprandomizationmight not be a feasible alternative at all or group-randomized studies might becontaminated. Thus, the decisive advantage of randomized controlled trials, that they and onlythey provide for a completely convincing identification strategy in the presence of observableand unobservable confounders, is lost. There are alternative strategies for the identification oftreatment effects also in the case of unobservable confounders, however, although theyspecifically require unverifiable a prioriinformation to be available. Moreover, when using non experimentaldata, one can often easily extend sample size at low cost, and thus estimateparameters very precisely; therefore, for any particular situation the relative attractiveness ofexperimental andnon-experimental approaches should be explored. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonn | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aIZA Discussion Papers |x206 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C92 | en |
dc.subject.jel | I18 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C24 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Randomized controlled trials | en |
dc.subject.keyword | self-selection | en |
dc.subject.keyword | econometric evaluation | en |
dc.subject.keyword | observational studies | en |
dc.subject.stw | Tobit-Modell | en |
dc.subject.stw | Stichprobenverfahren | en |
dc.subject.stw | Experiment | en |
dc.subject.stw | Gesundheitspolitik | en |
dc.subject.stw | Bewertung | en |
dc.subject.stw | Theorie | en |
dc.title | The Evaluation of Community-Based Interventions: Group Randomization, Limits and Alternatives | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 835470725 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Datei(en):
Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.