Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/205134
Autoren: 
Waichman, Israel
Requate, Tilman
Karde, Markus
Milinski, Manfred
Datum: 
2019
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
KCG Working Paper No. 19
Zusammenfassung: 
Avoiding a catastrophic climate change event is a global public good characterized by several dimensions, notably heterogeneity between the parties involved. It is often argued that such heterogeneity between countries is a major obstacle to cooperative climate policy. We challenge this belief by experimentally simulating two important heterogeneities, in wealth and loss, when dangerous climate change occurs. We find that under loss heterogeneity the success rate in achieving sufficient mitigation to prevent catastrophic climate change is higher than with homogeneous parties. We also observe that neither endowment heterogeneity nor the combination of endowment and loss heterogeneities lead to significantly different success rates than with homogeneous parties. Our findings suggest that heterogeneities may facilitate rather than hinder successful international climate policy negotiations.
Schlagwörter: 
global public good
change negotiation
collective-risk social dilemma
endowmentheterogeneity
loss heterogeneity
focal point
JEL: 
C92
D74
H41
Q54
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
989.38 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.