Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/203650
Authors: 
Diederich, Johannes
Eckel, Catherine C.
Epperson, Raphael
Goeschl, Timo
Grossman, Philip J.
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2019: 30 Jahre Mauerfall - Demokratie und Marktwirtschaft - Session: Public Economics III No. C14-V1
Abstract: 
We present online-experimental evidence that challenges the generalizability of established results on subsidizing giving by considering a "quantity donation" scheme. We define this scheme as one in which donors choose how many units of a charitable good to fund, rather than the amount of money to give. We find that different subsidy types are equally effective in raising funds. This contrasts with the common result of matches being superior to rebates. The finding masks a higher likelihood of giving under rebates and larger donations under matches and discounts. Our results emphasize the role of small changes in the donation environment.
Subjects: 
Charitable giving
subsidies
online field experiment
framing
JEL: 
C93
D12
D64
H24
H41
L31
Document Type: 
Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.