Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/203580 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2019: 30 Jahre Mauerfall - Demokratie und Marktwirtschaft - Session: Empirical Finance No. G05-V1
Publisher: 
ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Kiel, Hamburg
Abstract: 
We investigate whether credit rating agencies systematically follow each other's rating decisions. Therefore we rely on the rotation of rating analysts within credit rating agencies and their impact on the rating. Using this institutional setup we can disentangle causal herding behavior from simple co-movement between credit rating agencies due to changes in firm fundamentals. Rating analysts have substantial influence on ratings and we use their individual optimism/pessimism as instrumental variable to estimate causal effects of a rating change induced by an analyst on rating changes by other credit rating agencies. For our comprehensive sample of U.S. and European firms, rated by S&P, Moody's and Fitch between 1995 - 2016, we find significant herding behavior among credit rating agencies. This average herding behavior amounts to 0.4 notches for a one notch change at another credit rating agency, which is roughly half the size of the simple co-movement between credit rating agencies.
JEL: 
G14
Document Type: 
Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.