Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/191637
Authors: 
Krieger, Tim
Meierrieks, Daniel
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper Series, Wilfried-Guth-Stiftungsprofessur für Ordnungs- und Wettbewerbspolitik 2019-02
Abstract: 
In recent years, a number of major terrorist attacks in EU member states has put the fight against homegrown and international terrorism at the top of the agenda of European policy-makers. This paper analyzes the costs of terrorism in the European Union from both a theoretical and empirical perspective in order to evaluate counter-terrorism policies by comparing their costs and benefits. Two important policy implications can be derived from our exercise. First, individuals' behavioral predispositions typically result in a biased perception of the risk of terrorism leading to too high a demand for counter-terrorism measures relative to what the objective probability of terrorist events suggests. This results in a tendency to favor repressive over preventive measures against terrorism. Second, uncoordinated European policies against terrorism have the potential to undermine the effectiveness of counter-terrorism measures. If there is a justification for the existence of the European Union (which an increasing number of populist parties in Europe seems to doubt), then it is to provide supranational answers to coordination failure in European counter-terrorism policies.
Subjects: 
terrorism
home-grown terrorism
European Union
counter-terrorism policies
coordination failure
behavioral responses to terrorism
JEL: 
D74
H56
N44
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
468.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.