Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181902
Authors: 
Haselmann, Rainer
Wahrenburg, Mark
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
SAFE White Paper 54
Abstract: 
We provide an assessment of the design and calibration of the 2018 EU-wide stress test. The adverse scenario for the 2018 stress test is more severe than for previous stress tests in terms of the assumed GDP decline in the EU area. However, the test is less severe in terms of the losses that banks are expected to incur under the scenario. The adverse scenario has a highly asymmetric impact on different European countries, such that countries with a high degree of trade openness are affected considerably more. It seems unlikely that the assumed scenario constitutes the most plausible threat scenario for the EU economy. Since banks use heterogeneous models to forecast the stress scenario impact on loan losses and since the EBA does not publish its own respective benchmark parameters, the public cannot fully assess the true severity of the test in terms of its impact on banks' capital. We argue that both the lack of transparency and the heterogeneity of banks' practices to forecast stress scenario induced losses considerably weaken the credibility of the stress test and limit its usefulness in supporting market discipline among European banks.
Subjects: 
Banking union
European banks
Stress test
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-846-3131-5
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
557.22 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.