Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Ottardi, Claudia
Damonti, Alessio
Porazzi, Emanuele
Foglia, Emanuela
Ferrario, Lucrezia
Villa, Tomaso
Aimar, Enrico
Brayda-Bruno, Marco
Galbusera, Fabio
Year of Publication: 
[Journal:] Health Economics Review [ISSN:] 2191-1991 [Volume:] 7 [Issue:] 17 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Year:] 2017 [Pages:] 1-10
Springer, Heidelberg
Objective: Lumbar arthrodesis is a common surgical technique that consists of the fixation of one or more motion segments with pedicle screws and rods. However, spinal surgery using these techniques is expensive and has a significant impact on the budgets of hospitals and Healthcare Systems. While reusable and disposable instruments for laparoscopic interventions have been studied in literature, no specific information exists regarding instrument kits for lumbar arthrodesis. The aim of the present study was to perform a complete health technology assessment comparing a disposable instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis (innovative device) with the standard reusable instrument. Methods: A prospective and observational study was implemented, by means of investigation of administrative records of patients undergoing a lumbar arthrodesis surgical procedure. The evaluation was conducted in 2013, over a 12- month time horizon, considering all the procedures carried out using the two technologies. A complete health technology assessment and a multi-criteria decision analysis approach were implemented in order to compare the two alternative technologies. Economic impact (with the implementation of an activity based costing approach), social, ethical, organisational, and technology-related aspects were taken into account. Results: Although the cost analysis produced similar results in the comparison of the two technologies (total cost equal to € 4,279.1 and € 4,242.6 for reusable instrument kit and the disposable one respectively), a significant difference between the two instrument kits was noted, in particular concerning the organisational impact and the patient safety. Conclusions: The replacement of a reusable instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis, with a disposable one, could improve the management of this kind of devices in hospital settings. Keywords: Lumbar arthrodesis, Multi-criteria decision analysis, Health technology assessment, Reusable instrument, Disposable instrument, Italy
Lumbar arthrodesis
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Health technology assessment
Reusable instrument
Disposable instrument
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 

Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.