Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175362
Authors: 
Klasen, Stephan
Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada
Nowak-Lehmann D., Felicitas
Brückner, Matthias
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
IAI Discussion Papers No. 235
Publisher: 
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research (IAI), Göttingen
Abstract: 
In this paper, we examine the extent to which developing countries export more as a result of being officially labelled as an LDC and consequently being eligible for a range of unilateral trade preferences. We estimate a gravity model of trade over the period of 1970 to 2013, in which identification is achieved by exploiting the particularities and asymmetries of "inclusion" and "graduation" criteria from LDC status. The main results show that inclusion in the official LDC list is associated with substantially higher exports. This is particularly the case for LDCs that also export manufactured and industrial goods and started to play a significant role after 1990. In addition, we evaluate the impact of developed countries' trade preferences on the exports of LDCs and the effectiveness of the trade preference schemes of the EU, the US, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Norway and Turkey to better understand the mechanism at play. Unilateral preference regimes are, on average, not always beneficial in terms of increased export values for beneficiary developing countries but do have an impact on some sectors. They are mostly beneficial for agricultural goods and a few for manufactured goods, including textiles. As far as individual preference schemes are concerned, positive and statistically significant effects are found for the GSP schemes of Canada and Turkey. The positive effect of LDC status, however, is statistically significant and sizable even when controlling for trade preference schemes suggesting that other benefits of that status play a role in promoting exports.
Subjects: 
least developed countries
trade preferences
gravity model
generalized system of preferences
JEL: 
F10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.