Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/153712
Authors: 
Cantore, Cristiano
León-Ledesma, Miguel A.
McAdam, Peter
Willman, Alpo
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
ECB Working Paper 1278
Abstract: 
The reaction of hours worked to technology shocks represents a key controversy between RBC and New Keynesian explanations of the business cycle. It sparked a large empirical literature with contrasting results. We demonstrate that, with a more general and data coherent supply and production framework (“normalized” factor-augmenting CES technology), both models can plausibly generate impacts of either sign. We develop analytical expressions to establish the threshold between positive and negative contemporaneous correlations for both models. These will crucially depend on the factor-augmentation nature of the shock, the elasticity of factor substitution, the capital income share, and the reaction of consumption. The impact of technology on hours can thus hardly be taken as evidence in support of any particular business-cycle model. Our results are also important as: i) we introduce the concept of normalization for DSGE models and, ii) they may help interpret possible time-variation in technology and hours correlations over time.
Subjects: 
Factor Bias
Factor Substitution
HoursWorked
Normalization
RBC and NK models
Technology shocks
JEL: 
E32
E23
E25
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.