Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149063
Authors: 
Ernst, Holger
Teichert, Thorsten Andreas
Year of Publication: 
1997
Series/Report no.: 
Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 445
Abstract: 
Benchmarking of innovation processes requires the reliable assessment of nondocumented organizational characteristics. Based on key informant literature we discuss the difficulties of gaining reliable information from respondents and identify potential sources for heterogeneous perceptions among different respondents. We apply an existing benchmarking approach to critical success factors of innovation processes in a comprehensive case study of a major German industrial corporation. We find that perceptions differ substantially among the individual respondents. In particular, we observe different functional perceptions between respondents from Marketing and Research & Development. The results are consistent with expectations from interface theory. These perceptual differences have a severe impact on the managerial conclusions drawn from benchmarking. There appears to be no single reliable source of information within an organization. Furthermore, variances among informants' assessments should be recognized and regarded as valuable information for the benchmarking process. It is our recommendation that multiple informants ought to be included in the evaluation of innovation processes in future benchmarking studies.
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Document Version: 
Digitized Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.