Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/142322
Authors: 
Budzinski, Oliver
Köhler, Karoline Henrike
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 97
Abstract: 
Dominant or apparently dominant internet platform increasingly become subject to both antitrust investigations and further-reaching political calls for regulation. While Google is currently in the focus of the discussion, the next candidate is already on the horizon - the ubiquitous online trading platform Amazon. Competitors and suppliers but also famous economists like Paul Krugman unite in criticizing Amazon's market power and alleged abuse of it. In this paper, we collect the multitude of allegations against Amazon and categorize them according to types of potential anticompetitive conduct or types of market failure. We provide an economic analysis of these allegations based upon economic theory as well as publicly available information and data. As one of our main results, we find that the most severe allegations against Amazon do not hold from an economic perspective and, consequently, do not warrant regulation or other drastic interventions (like breaking the company up). However, several areas of conduct, in particular, the use of best price clauses and the (anti-) competitive interplay of Amazon and the major publishers in the e-book market require competition policy action. The standard antitrust instruments, enriched with modern economic theory, should suffice to disincentivize the identified anticompetitive conduct for now.
Subjects: 
antitrust
internet
platform economics
media economics
competition policy
innovation
Amazon
Google
e-books
book industry
best-price clauses
abuse of dominance
pricing
regulation
JEL: 
K21
L41
L42
L81
K23
L50
L82
L12
D40
L25
Z11
B52
L86
M21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
245.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.