Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Bassi, Vittorio
Huck, Steffen
Rasul, Imran
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2016-304
Multiple sources of funding are becoming increasingly important for charitable organizations. Donations from corporate donors for example account for 25-35% of charitable income for the largest US charities, across charitable sectors. This note presents some tentative first evidence from a natural field experiment to shed light on how different types of potential donors: individuals, corporates and aristocratically titled individuals, respond to the same fundraising drive. Each donor type was randomly assigned to treatments varying in two dimensions: (i) whether information was conveyed about the existence of an anonymous lead donor; (ii) how individual donations would be matched by the anonymous lead donor. We find that aristocrats are significantly more likely to respond and that corporates give significantly more than individuals. Treatment effects moreover suggest that (proportional) matching is to be avoided for corporate donors.
agency problems
charitable giving
corporate donors
aristocratic donors
field experiment
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
227.11 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.