Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/130615
Authors: 
Gawel, Erik
Lehmann, Paul
Purkus, Alexandra
Söderholm, Patrik
Witte, Katherina
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2016
Abstract: 
In order to achieve cost-effective RES-E deployment it is often argued that technology-neutral support schemes for renewables are indispensable. Against this background, RES-E support policies making widely use of technology differentiation in remuneration settings, e.g. across the EU, are frequently criticized from a theoretical point of view. However, in this paper we provide a systematic critique of the technology neutrality concept as a foundation for designing policy support schemes in the RES-E technology field. Specifically, the main objective of the paper is to scrutinize the arguments for technology-neutrality, and discuss three conceptual arguments for why technology-specific support schemes could in fact help minimize the societal costs of reaching future RES-E targets. We also briefly address different political economy concerns, which could constrain the choice of cost-effective policy support schemes, and that have to be taken into account for economic policy advice. For empirical illustration of the key arguments we refer to the case of German RES-E support.
Subjects: 
renewable energy technologies
technology-specific support
market failures
Germany
JEL: 
O38
Q42
Q48
Q55
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
278.59 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.