Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129105
Authors: 
Rechbauer, Martina
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Arqus-Diskussionsbeiträge zur quantitativen Steuerlehre 201
Abstract: 
Due to data restrictions, empirical tax research commonly relies on database-driven methods as a means of identifying firms' tax loss carry-forward (TLCF) status. Employing a panel of listed Italian parent companies, I am the first to empirically examine the accuracy of database-driven methods in predicting the availability and the amount of TLCF at single-firm level. In order to assess the accuracy of database-driven identification methods, I compare firms' true TLCF status, as determined based on IFRS statement information, to the TLCF status predictions of the methods examined. I find that database-driven methods do not perform well in predicting the availability of TLCF. They perform poorly in predicting the amount of TLCF available to firms. Empirical studies that rely on database-driven identification methods might thus not be able to derive reliable results regarding the impact of TLCF. My findings thus indicate that there is a strong need for firm-specific TLCF information provided by local authorities in empirical tax research.
Subjects: 
identification
tax loss carry-forwards
database-driven methods
JEL: 
C81
H25
K34
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
544.27 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.