Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/120868 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2015
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
EFForTS Discussion Paper Series No. 18
Verlag: 
GOEDOC, Dokumenten- und Publikationsserver der Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper investigates the trade-off between conservation and equity considerations in the use of payments for environmental services (PES) that implicitly incorporate different distributive justice principles. Using a public good experiment with heterogeneous participants, we compare the effects on additional area conserved and distribution of earnings of two PES schemes: an equal payment and a payment based on Rawls distributional principle, which we refer to as maxi-min payment scheme. The main findings of the framed field experiment conducted in Jambi province (Indonesia) indicate that the introduction of a maxi-min PES scheme can function as a multi-purpose instrument. It realigns the income distribution in favor of low-endowed participants and does not necessarily need to be compromised by lower environmental additionality at the group level.
Schlagwörter: 
Payments for Environmental Services
efficiency equity trade-off
public good experiment
endowment heterogeneity
productivity heterogeneity
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.6 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.