Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Techert, Holger
Niehues, Judith
Bardt, Hubertus
Gawel, Erik
Korte, Klaas
Löschel, Andreas
Flues, Florens
Heindl, Peter
Year of Publication: 
[Journal:] Wirtschaftsdienst [ISSN:] 1613-978X [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 92 [Year:] 2012 [Issue:] 8 [Pages:] 507-519
Aktuell wird darüber diskutiert, ob das Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) obere Einkommenschichten begünstige. Dem wird entgegengehalten, dass die Energiepolitik nicht auf die Einkommensverteilung gerichtet sei, dafür seien andere Politikbereiche verantwortlich. Wenn überhaupt, sollten die Begünstigungen für energieintensive Industrien im EEG in den Fokus genommen werden. Dennoch stellt sich die Frage, ob das EEG sein eigentliches Ziel, die CO2-Vermeidung, mit effizienten Mitteln erreicht.
Abstract (Translated): 
The ongoing economic criticism of the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) recently started focusing on distributional effects, too. A team of authors at the Cologne Institute for Economic Research is worried about high costs for electricity consumers. They argue since electric power consumption is only slightly correlated with income, the financial burden of the EEG is substantially higher for low-income households than for high-income households. This regressive effect is even increased since particularly high-income households have installed photovoltaic systems and thereby gain from green power subsidies. In contrast, other authors argue that this debate on distributional effects, while desirable, often scandalizes rather common issues of everyday economic events while ignoring the real EEG-induced redistribution effects, that is to say the EEG reallocation charge privilege for energy-intensive industries. These authors advise against drawing on partial analysis when discussing distribution-related issues of the EEG. A team of authors at the ZEW are concerned about the cost-effi ciency of the EEG which is the underlying reason for the recent discussions on distributional effects. The energy transition will entail large additional cost which will have to be carried. Increasing the effi ciency of governmental energy and climate policies will increase acceptance and attenuate distributional effects.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 

Files in This Item:
245.95 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.