Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/105083
Authors: 
Lange, Andreas
Schwirplies, Claudia
Ziegler, Andreas
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics 47-2014
Abstract: 
This paper provides theoretical and empirical insights on the extent to which the availability of carbon offsetting may substitute the individual use of other carbon-reducing measures. Theoretically, we demonstrate an ambiguous impact of offsetting on the use of other measures and derive conditions under which both are substitutes or complements. We then empirically test our predictions using data from representative surveys among more than 2000 citizens in Germany and the U.S. Considering seven measures that can be taken by individuals to directly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, our empirical evidence is consistent with the theoretical predictions that substitution occurs particularly if individuals lay a sufficiently large weight on environmental preference or if offsetting is perceived to be relatively effective in providing the public good climate protection. Complementary effects are shown to exist for a perceived intermediate effectiveness of offsetting activities.
Subjects: 
climate change
climate protection
green consumption
carbon offsetting
complement
substitute
impure public goods
JEL: 
C25
Q54
Q58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
598.13 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.