Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/53346 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorGuivarch, Célineen
dc.contributor.authorHallegatte, Stéphaneen
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-01-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T11:33:38Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T11:33:38Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53346-
dc.description.abstractPolitical attention has increasingly focused on limiting warming to 2êC. However, to date the only mitigation commitments accompanying this target are the so-called Copenhagen pledges, and these pledges appear to be inconsistent with the 2êC objective. Diverging opinions on whether this inconsistency can or should be resolved have been expressed. This paper clarifies the alternative assumptions underlying these diverging view points and explicits their implications. It first gives simple visualizations of the challenge posed by the 2êC target. It then proposes a decision tree, linking different beliefs on climate change, the achievability of different policies, and current international policy dynamics to various options to move forward on climate change.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) |cMilanoen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aNota di Lavoro |x87.2011en
dc.subject.jelQ5en
dc.subject.jelQ58en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordFeasibility of 2êC Targeten
dc.subject.keywordClimate Change Negotiationsen
dc.title2C or not 2C?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn675907152en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
540.21 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.