Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/37029
Authors: 
Lütkebohmert, Eva
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Bonn econ discussion papers 2009,19
Abstract: 
We show that the saddle-point approximation method to quantify the impact of undiversified idiosyncratic risk in a credit portfolio is inappropriate in the presence of double default effects. Specifically, we prove that there does not exist an equivalent formula to the granularity adjustment, that accounts for guarantees, in case of the extended single-factor Credit Risk model. Moreover, in case of the model underlying the double default treatment within the internal ratings based (IRB) approach of Basel II, the saddle-point equivalent to the GA is too complex and involved to be competitive to a standard Monte Carlo approach.
Subjects: 
analytical approximation
Basel II
double default
granularity adjustment
IRB approach
saddle-point approximation
JEL: 
G31
G28
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
147.58 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.