Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58240 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKugler, Matthew B.en
dc.contributor.authorGoethals, George R.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-01T15:13:22Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-01T15:13:22Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58240-
dc.description.abstractTwo studies explored the experience and performance of students at Williams College in three-person groups that were homogeneous or heterogeneous in rated academic ability. In accord with hypotheses from Festinger's (1954) social comparison theory, students in academically homogeneous groups had more positive experiences and performed better on measures of written and video-taped performance. These results differ somewhat from recent studies of peer effects among roommates and from a line of recent social comparison research regarding the effect of exposure to superior others on one's own performance. In addition, students in single-sex groups had higher scores on several self-report and performance measures. Qualifying this finding were additional results showing that women did better in single-sex, while men did better in mixed-sex groups. The overall results were framed in terms of social comparison dynamics.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aWilliams College, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education (WPEHE) |cWilliamstown, MAen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWPEHE Discussion Paper |x70en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.stwSoziale Gruppeen
dc.subject.stwVerhaltenen
dc.subject.stwStudierendeen
dc.titleSocial comparison of abilities at an elite college: Feeling outclassed with 1350 SATs-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn592669017en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
173.37 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.