Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/25665 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGüth, Werneren
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-14-
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-27T09:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-27T09:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/25665-
dc.description.abstractEconomic theory has evolved without paying proper attention to behavioral approaches, especially to social, economic, and cognitive psychology. This has recently changed by including behavioral economics courses in many doctoral study programs. Although this new development is most welcome, the typical topics of the behavioral economics courses are not truly behavioral. More specifically, we question whether neoclassical repairs or game fitting exercises as well as more or less mechanic adaptation processes qualify as behavioral approaches. To avoid criticizing without offering alternatives, we suggest some truly behavioral concepts, especially the satisficing approach.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aFriedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics |cJenaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aJena Economic Research Papers |x2007,099en
dc.subject.jelA11en
dc.subject.jelB41en
dc.subject.jelB52en
dc.subject.jelC72en
dc.subject.jelC91en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keyword(Un)Bounded rationalityen
dc.subject.keywordSatisficingen
dc.subject.keywordLearningen
dc.subject.keywordExperimental and Behavioral Economicsen
dc.subject.stwVerhaltensökonomiken
dc.subject.stwBeschränkte Rationalitäten
dc.subject.stwLernprozessen
dc.subject.stwTesten
dc.title(Non-) behavioral economics: a programmatic assessment-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn554124645en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
367.25 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.