Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.description.abstract||This paper investigates a local problem of common pool resources (CPR), the solutionof which needs a balance between the collective and private interests. In the politicalcontext we have a large group of actors with a short planning horizon and a lack of trustamong them. CPR provision is organised in a centralised way. The state enforcementmechanism is weak and cannot protect the individuals or eventually back the collectivedecisions. The above problem is investigated in the case of irrigation in Bulgaria wherewater usage declined by nearly 85% during the period of transition. In addition, largeparts of the existing canal systems were abandoned. Three groups of institutional optionsare investigated in the paper: improvement of the local level co-ordination; limitingthe market imperfections, and strengthening the external conflict resolution andsanctioning mechanisms. The investigation of the above case led the author to conclusionsthat can be generalised for the case of CPR management during the period of transition.The transition process is not just a process of transferring western institutions toEastern Europe, but also a process of spontaneous emerging of new institutions at locallevel. Therefore, we call for state intervention, not in the area of CPR provision, but insupporting local co-ordination.||en_US|
|dc.relation.ispartofseries|||aCEESA discussion paper / Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences |x2004,2||en_US|
|dc.title||Institutional options for sustainable irrigation : an evidence from Bulgaria||en_US|
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.