EconStor >
Kavala Institute of Technology, Greece >
International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research (IJESAR) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66648
  
Title:Amortisation versus impairment of goodwill and accounting quality PDF Logo
Authors:Van Hulzen, Paul
Alfonso, Laura
Georgakopoulos, Georgios
Sotiropoulos, Ioannis
Issue Date:2011
Citation:[Journal:] International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research [ISSN:] 1791-3373 [Volume:] 4 [Year:] 2011 [Issue:] 3 [Pages:] 93-118
Abstract:In this paper there has been made a comparison between the amortisation and the impairment methods for accounting for goodwill, with regards to their associated effects on accounting quality. Based on two qualitative characteristics of accounting information, as formulated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the effects of the new impairment method are examined using a value relevance and a timeliness model. The sample consists of European companies that adopted this new method of goodwill accounting, following the required adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2005. The results indicate that impairment of goodwill is actually less value relevant than amortisation, but that it does lead to more timely accounting information. It is concluded that the objective of the IASB in issuing a new accounting standard is not completely met and it only partially contributes to higher accounting quality.
Subjects:amortisation
impairment
goodwill
value relevance
timeliness
JEL:M21
M41
M48
Document Type:Article
Appears in Collections:International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research (IJESAR)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
687538963.pdf330.4 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66648

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.