Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/47893 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorKoppel, Hannesen
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Günther G.en
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-11T10:08:24Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-11T10:08:24Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/47893-
dc.description.abstractWe conduct a field experiment on direct and indirect transfer mechanisms. It shows that people are willing to donate significantly more if the donation is indirect, i.e., it is tied to the purchase of a good with a price premium, rather than made directly. This points to an efficiency-effectiveness trade-off: even though indirect donations are less efficient than direct donations, they are more effective in mobilizing resources. Our findings hold for 'Fair Trade' coffee as well as for 'normal' coffee. However, the strength of the efficiency-effectiveness trade-off is higher in the case of 'Fair Trade'.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aUniversity of Freiburg, Department of International Economic Policy (iep) |cFreiburg i. Br.en
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiscussion Paper Series |x2en
dc.subject.jelC93en
dc.subject.jelD63en
dc.subject.jelD64en
dc.subject.jelH21en
dc.subject.jelH41en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordTied transfersen
dc.subject.keyworddonationsen
dc.subject.keywordcharityen
dc.subject.keywordefficiency versus effectivenessen
dc.subject.keyword'fair trade'en
dc.titleInefficient but effective? A field experiment on the effectiveness of direct and indirect transfer mechanisms-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn587483059en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:fre:wpaper:2en

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
4.91 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.