Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/27871
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-Feld | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Scholl, Wolfgang | en |
dc.contributor.author | Schanz, Kay-Michael | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-12-19 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-10T13:57:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-10T13:57:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.pi | urn:nbn:de:101:1-2009011553 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27871 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article analyses the recent Leica judgement of the Higher Regional Court Frankfurt/Main and its consequences. In this judgement, the court has established an infringement of special formal requirements with respect to Leica´s invitation to the Annual General Meeting which, if correct, would bear dire consequences for a variety of listed companies, even in DAX. On the other hand, there is a recent decision of the Higher Regional Court Munich in a similar case concerning Hypovereinsbank, coming to the opposite conclusion. Besides the fact that, in the opinion of the authors, the Leica decision not only is legally unfounded and based on a completely unbalanced evaluation of formalistic requirements, it again proves the formalistic approach of German stock corporation law and leaves companies, especially with a respective regulation in their articles of association, their advisors and investors in a situation of uncertainty that has to be clarified urgently by the legislator. | en |
dc.language.iso | ger | en |
dc.publisher | |aFrankfurt School of Finance & Management |cFrankfurt a. M. | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aFrankfurt School - Working Paper Series |x104 | en |
dc.subject.jel | K12 | en |
dc.subject.jel | K19 | en |
dc.subject.jel | K22 | en |
dc.subject.jel | K29 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Annual general meeting | en |
dc.subject.keyword | invitation | en |
dc.subject.keyword | power of attorney | en |
dc.subject.keyword | authorization | en |
dc.subject.keyword | written form | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Leica | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Hypovereinsbank | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Wella | en |
dc.title | Aktionärsschutz in der AG falsch verstanden? Die Leica-Entscheidung des LG Frankfurt am Main | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 585826072 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
dc.identifier.repec | RePEc:zbw:fsfmwp:104 | en |
Datei(en):
Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.