Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/263936 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI 2022-016/I
Publisher: 
Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
Abstract: 
Many everyday activities are habitual. Among the most common human activities is communication. If people primarily communicate in a common-interests environment, they may form habits of truth-telling and believing messages. If they primarily communicate in a conflicting-interests environment, they may form habits of lying and mistrusting mes- sages. We provide experimental evidence that habits affect strategic communication in an unfamiliar environment. Additionally, we contrast two mechanisms through which habits operate, preference formation and inattention. By varying the frequency of communicating in the unfamiliar environment, we find an effect only when the unfamiliar environment oc- curs rarely. Our results favor inattention as preference formation would predict an effect irrespective of the frequency of the new environment. Analysis of individual decisions sheds further light on the mechanisms. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for habits, especially when studying human behavior in infrequent situations.
Subjects: 
Habits
Strategic information transmission
Communication
Experiment
JEL: 
D91
C92
D01
D83
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.94 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.