EconStor >
ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München >
CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58339
  
Title:Differential prize taxation and structural discrimination in contests PDF Logo
Authors:Mealem, Yosef
Nitzan, Shmuel
Issue Date:2012
Series/Report no.:CESifo working paper: Public Choice 3831
Abstract:This paper evaluates differential prize taxation and structural discrimination as a means of increasing efforts in the most widely studied contests. We establish that a designer who maximizes efforts subject to a balanced-budget constraint prefers dual discrimination, namely, change of the contestants' prize valuations as well as bias of the impact of their efforts. Optimal twofold discrimination is often superior to any single mode of discrimination under any lottery. Surprisingly, in the general N-player contest game, under the prototypical simple lottery, it can yield the maximal possible efforts: the highest valuation of the contested prize. If a single mode of discrimination is allowed, then differential taxation is superior to structural discrimination.
Subjects:contest design
balanced-budget-constraint
differential prize taxation
structural discrimination
dual polarized discrimination
contest success function
lottery
JEL:D70
D72
D74
D78
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
716981599.pdf258.17 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58339

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.