Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/98867
Authors: 
Lindeboom, Maarten
van der Klaauw, Bas
Vriend, Sandra
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 14-038/V
Abstract: 
We provide evidence from a large-scale field experiment on the causal effects of audit rules on compliance in a market for long-term care. In this setting care should be provided quickly and, therefore, the gatekeeper introduced ex-post auditing. Our results do not show significant effects of variations in random audit rates and switching to a conditional audit regime on the quantity and quality of applications for care. We also do not find evidence for heterogeneous effects across care providers differing in size or hospital status. Our preferred explanation for the lack of audit effects is the absence of direct sanctions for noncompliance. The observed divergence of audit rates in the conditional audit regime is the consequence of sorting and thus identifies the quality of application behavior of providers.
Subjects: 
auditing
field experiment
compliance
feedback
long-term care
JEL: 
C93
H51
I18
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
729.63 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.