Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/98330
Authors: 
Guinnane, Timothy W.
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
Center Discussion Paper 907
Abstract: 
Research on 'trust' now forms a prominent part of the research agenda in history and the social sciences. Although this research has generated useful insights, the idea of trust has been used so widely and loosely that it risks creating more confusion than clarity. This essay argues that to the extent that scholars have a clear idea of what trust actually means, the concept is, at least for economic questions, superfluous: the useful parts of the idea of trust are implicit in older notions of information and the ability to impose sanctions. I trust you in a transaction because of what I know about you, and because of what I can have done to you should you cheat me. This observation does not obviate what many scholars intend, which is to embed economic action within a framework that recognizes informal institutions and social ties. I illustrate the argument using three examples drawn from an area where trust has been seen as critical: credit for poor people.
Subjects: 
Trust
Social Capital
Credit Cooperatives
Uniform Laws
JEL: 
G2
N2
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
93.74 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.