Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/95435
Authors: 
Pressman, Steven
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
LIS Working Paper Series 348
Abstract: 
This chapter examines the tradeoffs inherent in guaranteed income proposals. Its perspective is international, using standardized income data across nations and asking whether economic efficiency suffers when governments make greater efforts to protect the poor. It is recognized that this is not a perfect test of the guaranteed income plan, in large part because we are not actually testing anything about a guaranteed income plan. Nonetheless, we are testing one of the main issues surrounding guaranteed income plans, the equity - efficiency tradeoff raised by Okun - if governments do provide greater income supports, will economic efficiency suffer? The first section provides a brief history of the rise and fall of guaranteed income plans. Then the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), the main database for the empirical work of this chapter, is described. Using the LIS we see how governments of different countries affect income equality, and how this effort has changed over time. Section 4 examines whether those countries putting more fiscal effort into maintaining the incomes of its citizens operate less efficiently. Finally, Section 5 summarizes our findings and concludes.
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
366.77 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.